Leeds Local Safeguarding Children Board logo
Leeds Local Safeguarding Children Board title image
 
 

Sitemap

 

Serious Case Review in Respect of Child E

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
This review examined the circumstances around the life of a teenager who took his own life.  Child E suffered a troubled childhood and adolescence, and several agencies had had involvement.
THE PROCESS
The review has been commissioned by the Leeds Area Child Protection Committee (ACPC) under Part 8 of "Working Together to Safeguard Children - A Guide to Inter-Agency Working to Safeguard and Promote the Welfare of Children" (Department of Health, Home Office, Department for Education and Employment 1999). 
The purpose of the review is:
To establish whether there are lessons to be learned in the way in which local professionals and agencies working together;
To identify those lessons, how they will be acted upon, and what is expected to change as a result and to improve inter-agency working and better safeguard children.
The report was written by a panel convened by Leeds ACPC, and it was informed by the internal management reviews of West Yorkshire Police, Education Leeds, Leeds Health Trusts, Leeds Mental Health Trust, Children & Adolescent Mental Health Services, East Leeds Primary Care Trust, Leeds Social Services, the Youth Offending Team at Leeds and the Probation Service, West Yorkshire.
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL AGENCIES
Recommendations for West Yorkshire Police
There are no recommendations for West Yorkshire Police.
Recommendations for Education Leeds
  • To introduce an effective system for pupil tracking in relation to vulnerable pupils. This should include clear protocols on roles and responsibilities for admission and transfer between mainstream and alternative specialist provision, to ensure that a pupil remains on the role of the referring school until appropriate transfer procedures are agreed.
  • To review practice and establish clear procedures in relation to exclusion policies for pupils from LEA provision.  This should include the convening of multi-agency meetings, particularly in the case of vulnerable children, to ensure that child protection considerations have been fully explored.
  • To establish written procedures between schools, statutory and supporting agencies, that will improve educational access and attainment for vulnerable children.
Recommendations for the Health Service
To reiterate through training for all Health staff the need for holistic assessments of children which take into consideration their home environment.  Further, that such assessments are not an end in themselves and clear responsibility must be taken for implementing any intervention strategies by Health professionals following such an assessment.
  •   To consider the potential for Child Health Services to be more actively involved in monitoring ongoing need as indicated by the boy's behaviour and circumstances out of school, rather than just by child protection registration.
  • To bring the recommendations of the Serious Case Review to the attention of senior Adult Mental Health professionals within the context of Clinical Governance.
  • The need for practice development that addresses the recognition of the seriousness of long-term neglect and emotional abuse and the dangers of disguised compliance should be explored.
Recommendations for the Social Services Department
  • Where there are repeated presentations of a child on the CPR at Hospital A & E Departments, the reasons and motivation for these should be explored by the keyworker, even if these are not identified as suspicious by the Hospital.
  • Where the emotional health of young people is identified as a major issue in child protection cases, it is essential that this is identified through the child protection plan, and actually addressed.
  •   Where there is evidence of parental substance misuse impacting on the care of children in a child protection case, all possible attempts should be made to engage adult substance misuse workers in the process of assessment and planning for the children.
  • Where there is evidence of adult mental health on the care of children in a child protection case, all possible attempts should be made to engage adult mental health workers in the process of assessment and planning for the children.
  • Where, in the management of a child protection case, active consideration is being given to the appropriateness of children remaining with their current carer, but removal by legal intervention is felt likely to be counterproductive, it is essential that alternative care arrangements with the extended family should be explored.
Recommendations for the Youth Offending Team
  • That the YOT review their procedures to highlight child protection concerns where an individual expresses intentions of self-harm or suicide.
  • That YOT review their procedures to ensure that an appropriate agency continues to be involved with a child in cases where YOT have withdrawn.
Recommendations for the Probation Service
  • The Probation Service should ensure that staff are conscious of child protection concerns when dealing with clients who have responsibility for caring for children.
Recommendations for ACPC
  • That ACPC consider their procedures in relation to child protection conferences to include relevant education agencies.
  • That ACPC raise with the Department of Health the importance of GP co-operation with Serious Case Reviews.

Back to top

 
     
Fenweb Limited